Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Lens

Product Information

But once it's switched in, the narrow focus ring is smooth enough to obtain focus that is very nearly as good as when I use autofocus on the same subject.

55-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Lens - Photo Review AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Lens - Photo Review

if you patiently tap the shutter button for the best autofocus and hold it very steadily when taking the shot. Due to differences in field of view between the Nikon 55-300mm and Nikon 28-300mm, I had to adjust the focal length of the Nikon 55-300mm to match around 70mm of 28-300mm. But if you have shot with the 18-200mm or other DX lenses like Nikon 18-105mm or Nikon 18-135mm, you should have no problems with this.As the lens is zoomed to 135mm, the resolution drops off a little, but is still very good across the frame from wide open, reaching its peak at f/5. As you can see from the above tests, both perform equally well, with the 55-300mm performing just a little better than the 55-200mm towards the longer range at 200mm. An argument can be made that optical quality (especially away from the center of the frame) can affect the AF resolving and hence impact edge-case tracking, but that is incredibly difficult to quantify the impact to tracking, and like all optical performance test measurements, is highly subject to copy-to-copy variation (i. when zoomed in), along with the lack of the gold ring on the front of the lens indicate that the lens is not on the same level as professional-grade constant aperture lenses in terms of optics, which is quite understandable, considering what it can offer in terms of zoom range. For example, Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5,6 Di LD 70 mm-300 mm (has image stabilization and also macro mode, min focus distance is 0.

Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Review

Most of the outer parts are plastic – contributing the light weight of the lens –, but the optical elements are made of high-grade glass. If you are shooting in dusty/windy areas, my recommendation is to keep the teleconverter always on the lens if you absolutely need to change lenses. We do realise, however, that bokeh evaluation is subjective; so we've included several 100% crops for your perusal. Best results for sharpness seem to be achieved with the lens set to either 70mm or 100mm and ƒ/8, where sharpness is tack-sharp across the entire frame. Now here is where things start getting interesting for the 55-300mm – it performs sharper not only wide open, but also stopped down to f/8.If you are after wildlife, this lens is clearly not a good candidate – you would be much better off with the 70-300mm lens. telephoto zoom lens designed to complement the 18-55mm kit zoom that comes bundled with many cropped-sensor Nikon digital SLR cameras. Here is another image sample showing soft and pleasing background rendering: NIKON D300 + 55-300mm f/4. The center is pretty sharp throughout the focal range, with the corners being slightly soft when shooting wide open. Thanks to the use of ED low dispersion glass in the the design, the 55-300mm doesn't suffer much with the dreaded effects of chromatic aberrations.

Nikon 300mm f/4D AF-S Review - Photography Life Nikon 300mm f/4D AF-S Review - Photography Life

The AF-S (Silent Wave) autofocus actuator uses a small ultrasonic motor that's fairly quiet but not as fast or near-silent as Nikon's more advanced ring-type AF-S, and lacks full-time manual override in Single AF mode. At 1440 grams, the lens is only 100 grams lighter than the 70-200mm VR II and 130 grams lighter than the 80-400mm VR. To prevent issues with lens creep, Nikon provided a zoom lock on the lens exterior, similar to the ones on both 18-200mm and 28-300mm lenses.VR II, this lens is not plagued with a “lens breathing” issue and 300mm on the long side is truly like 300mm, not shorter. The Nikon 55-300mm VR lens is only designed to work on Nikon DX (cropped) sensors and has an equivalent field of view of approximately 82.