Honestly, the marketing team has my sympathy for this one, because I don't think I've ever read another book that so staunchly defies categorization. There are recognizable elements from traditional coming of age novels, but it isn't a bildungsroman; there are hints and whispers of magic but it isn't really fantasy; there are some classic Magical School tropes but it isn't remotely comparable to Harry Potter; and it's filled to the brim with philosophical references but its maddeningly esoteric approach is strangely alienating even to readers who are interested in its central themes. A large part of this book is just stumbling blindly alongside Sasha and waiting for everything to be made clear, which it never really is. Also, Kozhennikov SR may only be one aspect of fear. He is a command in the language of the universe, yes, but there are many variations of fear. Perhaps others still exist. Is fear more diluted now? What has changed? The first being the magic system itself (if you would even call it magic? They certainly never did, but then again they never explained anything in simple terms). The somewhat magical education was convoluted on purpose, a meticulously confusing mesh of all areas of study that seem to take you beyond human experience. All descriptions are abstract, and instead of explaining how something works it often felt like the tutors would merely repeat “do you understand?” until one day our characters did. It definitely felt like a book you simply had to go along with and hope for the best. The story's very ambiguity steadily feeds its mysteriousness and power, and Danielewski's mastery of postmodernist and cinema-derived rhetoric up the ante continuously, and stunningly. One of the most impressive excursions into the supernatural in many a year.

Vita Nostra changed the way I see the world. This book inspires obsession. My awareness of existence after reading it feels shifted, reframed somehow. I feel like I’ve stepped over the bounds of reality and entered some transcendental state. I can’t stop turning it over and over in my mind. The story behind the cover of Vita Nostra The Story Behind the Cover of Vita Nostra, by Marina & Sergey DyachenkoAlena and Aspirine/ Daughter from the Dark ( Russian: Алёна и Аспирин) (published in Russian and Ukrainian) Housekeeper" ( Russian: Домохранец) (from the book The Well Master) is a little house demon, looks like a little man with spider's legs.

The Execution (1999) ( Russian: Казнь) received a "The Wаnderer" [16] award in 2000 and the Reader Appreciation award "Sigma-F" [17] in 2000 as the Novel of the Year. Elfoush" ( Russian: Эльфуш) (from the book The Well Master) is a little flying somewhat intelligent creature, which resembles an elf. Little children and people who are in love can understand what elfoushes say, thus becoming their prey. Last Don Quixote (2000) ( Russian: Последний Дон Кихот), a variation on Miguel de Cervantes' novel, became a base for a theatrical play. The novel was awarded the "Bronze Snail" ( Russian: Бронзовая Улитка) (2001). Awards [ edit ]

Many others, Elizondo and Longe included (if I remember correctly, it's been a long few years), have made correlations between the UAP phenomena and consciousness. Alena and Aspirin ( Russian: Алёна и Аспирин), an unrelated psychological fantastic novel, was published in 2006. It was published in 2020 by HarperCollins as "Daughter from the Dark". The Pentacle ( Russian: Пентакль), co-written A. Valentinov ( Russian: А.Валентиновым) and G. L. Oldi ( Russian: Г. Л. Олди), was awarded the "Golden Caduceus" prize at the 2005 Star Bridge festival.

The Dyachenkos describe their work as "M-realism" with the 'M' "open to interpretation." Without defining the meaning of the "M", in 2014 Sergey Dyachenko explained it as "Marina's realism", expanding "that's where the romanticism comes from, and the stubborn humanism, and the hope for white magic and a better tomorrow." [5] [12] The way this is written makes everything feel constantly ominous, even when nothing outwardly disturbing or uneasy is happening. That’s another aspect that makes it stand out to me. A typical terror element is the inability to communicate with the outside world, but this book subverts it. Telephones are always accessible. But it’s not that Sasha can’t leave… she just starts to realize that she doesn’t want to. I have only felt this same feeling in a book once before: in Krabat and the Sorcerer's Mill by Otfried Preußler, which is another outstanding, transfixing masterpiece. Among the people who write fantasy novels, there is a clear over-representation of the English-speakers. However, there are many talented writers of other nationalities; the Dyachenko duet, winners of numerous literary awards, is one of them. I think the Dyachenkos are at the moment a strong contender to dethrone the Andrews in my personal “married couples writing” hierarchy. Others, like the people forced into going to the Institute, are more substantive. They are adverbs, verbs, pronouns, nouns, etc.

Customer reviews

Sasha Samokhina has always been an average sort of girl, if a bit overly studious—at least, that’s what she always thought before meeting the strange and imperious Farit Kozhennikov while on vacation with her mother. The bizarre tasks Kozhennikov sets her to as she goes through her final year of high school leave her with a pile of strange gold coins, used to pay for her entrance to a college she’s never heard of and has no desire to attend. But Kozhennikov gives her no choice but to attend the Institute of Special Technologies, where the lessons in Specialty are at first completely incomprehensible and the students’ transgressions and failures are punished by harm to their families. Yet Sasha continues to push forward in her studies… and soon she finds herself transformed as she discovers the truth of the “Special Technologies” she’s studying so fervently. The Frontier (1999) ( Russian: Рубеж), written with A. Valentinov ( Russian: А.Валентиновым) and H. L. Oldie ( Russian: Г. Л. Олди), was awarded the Golden Caduceus prize at the festival "Star Bridge - 2000". You are struggling, I know. Because your efforts are connected to — or, rather, limited by — what is internally permissible. You have a very clear notion of what is acceptable and what is not. I’m not talking about everyday things, the so-called principles, I am talking about the inner configuration of your personality, and of your ability to overcome stereotypes.”